CI
CHEGG, INC (CHGG)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 revenue of $105.1M and adjusted EBITDA of $23.1M both exceeded guidance; GAAP EPS was -$0.33 while non-GAAP EPS was $0.10, driven by disciplined cost control and incremental content licensing revenue .
- Subscription Services revenue was $89.7M (down 39% YoY) on 2.6M subscribers (down 40% YoY), reflecting ongoing traffic headwinds from Google AI Overviews; retention and ARPU increased YoY, partially offsetting acquisition pressure .
- Q3 2025 guidance: revenue $75–$77M, Subscription Services $67–$69M, gross margin 56–57%, adjusted EBITDA $7–$8M; management identified an additional $10M OpEx and $7M CapEx savings for 2026 and expects FY25 CapEx ≈$30M .
- Strategic review continues (acquisition, go-private, or standalone); Busuu growth accelerated (+15% YoY in Q2; B2B +39%), and Skills showed early traction (enrollments +16% QoQ; MAU +11% QoQ), positioning these as core growth engines .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Exceeded Q2 guidance on both revenue ($105M vs $100–$102M guided) and adjusted EBITDA ($23.1M vs $16–$17M guided); non-GAAP gross margin was 68% .
- Busuu momentum: +15% YoY revenue in Q2; B2B +39% YoY with improving retention (+22pp); management reiterated ~$48M Busuu 2025 revenue and positive adjusted EBITDA by Q1’26 .
- Cost discipline: non-GAAP OpEx down ~33% YoY to $64M; CapEx cut 60% YoY to $7M; FY25 CapEx ≈$30M and further ~50% reduction targeted in 2026 leveraging AI .
- “Expense discipline is now in our DNA… committed to unlocking each and every opportunity to strengthen cash flow” — CFO David Longo .
What Went Wrong
- Subscribers fell 40% YoY to 2.6M due to lower traffic from Google AI Overviews, pressuring Subscription Services revenue (-39% YoY) and acquisitions .
- Free cash flow was -$12M in Q2, impacted by ~$12.5M severance and annual hosting prepayment; GAAP net loss was -$35.7M .
- The business remains in transition: Q3 guidance implies sequential declines with gross margin compressing to 56–57% and adjusted EBITDA $7–$8M, reflecting seasonal and traffic headwinds .
Financial Results
GAAP and Non-GAAP Summary (chronological: Q2 2024 → Q1 2025 → Q2 2025)
Segment Breakdown (Q2 2025)
KPIs and Operating Metrics
Q2 2025 vs S&P Global Wall Street Consensus
Values retrieved from S&P Global. Note: Company emphasizes adjusted EBITDA ($23.106M) while consensus “EBITDA” may reflect a different definition; use caution comparing these directly .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We had a good Q2, exceeding our guidance and actively engaging on the strategic review process… implementing AI to transform Chegg Study… and evolving to be a skills focused organization, with Busuu and Skills… future growth engines.” — Nathan Schultz, CEO .
- “Busuu continues on a strong path, achieving a 15% year-over-year revenue increase in Q2… B2B… 39% year-over-year revenue growth.” — Nathan Schultz .
- “We had 2.6 million subscribers… decline of 40%… lower traffic, largely due to Google AI Overviews. Despite the traffic trends, retention and ARPU increased year over year.” — David Longo, CFO .
- “Monthly retention rate was up 117 basis points in Q2.” — Nathan Schultz .
- “Successfully cured our stock price deficiency during the quarter and regained compliance with the NYSE’s price listing requirements.” — David Longo .
- “Identified an additional $10 million of operating expense savings and $7 million in CapEx savings in 2026.” — David Longo .
Q&A Highlights
- Busuu B2B growth durability: Management emphasized a robust direct enterprise sales motion (not solely reseller-driven) and confidence in sustaining growth, with deeper execution on enterprise sales metrics and expanding Guild partnership .
- Chegg Study institution pilots: Focus shifts from adding logos to proving efficacy to unlock campus-wide implementations in 2026–2027; seat-based pricing model to maximize student coverage .
- Busuu B2C drivers: Targeting “success seeker” personas and AI “speaking practice” features improved acquisition and stickiness .
- Skills competitive positioning: Transitioned from long-form bootcamps to microlearning aligned to current demand; optimistic on capturing future AI education spend .
Estimates Context
- Q2 2025 delivered a revenue and EPS beat versus consensus: revenue $105.12M vs $103.13M*, EPS $0.10 vs $0.047*; adjusted EBITDA outperformed company guidance but consensus “EBITDA” definitions differ, requiring caution in comparison .
- Q3 2025 consensus sits near guidance: revenue ~$76.20M* vs $75–$77M guided; EPS -$0.083* and EBITDA ~$7.66M* align with adjusted EBITDA guidance ($7–$8M) after definition reconciliation.
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- The quarter was a clear operational beat vs guidance on revenue, gross margin, and adjusted EBITDA; non-GAAP EPS positive at $0.10, signaling effective cost execution despite top-line pressure .
- Continued subscriber declines and Q3 guide-down reflect persistent traffic headwinds from Google AI Overviews; retention and ARPU improvements indicate stronger unit economics when students reach Chegg .
- Busuu is emerging as a growth engine with accelerating B2B and steady B2C trends; management’s ~$48M FY25 revenue target and Q1’26 positive adjusted EBITDA frame near-term profitability inflection potential .
- Skills shows green shoots (enrollments/MAU up QoQ) after product modernization toward microlearning; 2026 targets imply medium-term growth/profit trajectories .
- Cash and investments of $114.1M and net cash of $52M provide flexibility to navigate the transition; additional OpEx/CapEx savings identified for 2026 support margin durability .
- Strategic alternatives remain a potential stock catalyst alongside institution pilots’ efficacy results and content licensing monetization; note definitional differences in EBITDA when comparing to consensus .
- Near term, watch Q3 execution vs guidance, Busuu B2B pipeline conversion, and institutional pilots’ efficacy outcomes; medium term, thesis hinges on diversified revenue mix (Busuu/Skills/licensing) and AI-enabled cost leverage .